According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the general meeting of the target company. The incumbent board can, nonetheless, search for a competing bid, a so-called “white knight”. The rationale underpinning this exception is that competing bids always benefit target’s shareholders. In this paper I will tackle this rationale, arguing that even competing bids could generate a pressure to tender on target’s shareholders and, therefore, in this case should not be considered as a benefit for them
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
This paper aims to improve shareholder protection from underpriced bids in takeover situations. Targ...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the gener...
According to the EC Directive on takeovers regulation, defensive measures should be authorised by th...
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the gener...
This paper contains the European Company Law Experts\u27 response to the report of the European Comm...
We analyze the dynamics of takeover contests where hostile raiders compete against white knights inv...
Global Merger and Acquisition activity reached record levels in 2006, with the US and EU playing a l...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
Responding to my comments in the Stanford Law Review, and to those of Lucian Bebchuk in the Harvard ...
Better answers often await better questions. In the wake of a recent series of provocative articles ...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
With the non-frustration rule (“NFR”) and the mandatory bid rule, the Takeover Bid Directive contain...
In April 21, 2004, after 20-year-long negotiations and debates, the Council of the European Union p...
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
This paper aims to improve shareholder protection from underpriced bids in takeover situations. Targ...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the gener...
According to the EC Directive on takeovers regulation, defensive measures should be authorised by th...
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the gener...
This paper contains the European Company Law Experts\u27 response to the report of the European Comm...
We analyze the dynamics of takeover contests where hostile raiders compete against white knights inv...
Global Merger and Acquisition activity reached record levels in 2006, with the US and EU playing a l...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
Responding to my comments in the Stanford Law Review, and to those of Lucian Bebchuk in the Harvard ...
Better answers often await better questions. In the wake of a recent series of provocative articles ...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
With the non-frustration rule (“NFR”) and the mandatory bid rule, the Takeover Bid Directive contain...
In April 21, 2004, after 20-year-long negotiations and debates, the Council of the European Union p...
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
This paper aims to improve shareholder protection from underpriced bids in takeover situations. Targ...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...